Skip to content

General

General

Categories

184 results found

  1. This to have the possiblity to have a mix of differently sized servers.

    An easy solution would be to next to intipv4 and extipv4 in the CustomConfig servers list also have a servers.numberofcpus or servers.sumofcpu_speed.

    This would not be perfect, but probably is relatively easy to implement and would allow for some differentiation in most cases.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. 3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Clicking on the link to tell me more about server deletion setting on this page takes me to a help page about IP address management.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. 1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. At the moment LetsEncrypt and failover groups don't really work well together, and you basically have to renew certificates on both servers manually. Some kind of automatic redirect to the failover server, or sharing the certificate to both servers would work great.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. I put my stack in deployment lockdown mode to prevent deploys of new docker images. What happens is that all CI deploys (which build the docker images and trigger the deploy hook on git push) fail as the deploy hook returns:
    {"ok":false,"message":"stack requires authorization to deploy and can therefore not use redeployment hooks"}

    I'd rather have it return an non-error message with the hint to pending deploy authorization, like:
    {"ok":true,"lockdown":true,"message":"stack requires authorization to deploy, your deployment request has been issued"}

    With deployment lockdown, I want to turn off automatic deploys, but I'd love to have them scheduled for review so…

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. I usually have lots and lots of tabs open, and I can never find the cloud 66 tabs easily, so if you were to append cloud66 to your page titles it would make it easier to find open tabs.

    2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. cloud9 online ide plugin to setup a cloud9 remote ssh workspace in a few clicks. Useful in c66 development stacks.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. When deploying globally, it'd be nice if db writes could take place using the local db shard rather than a single master half way around the world. Scaling is incredibly limited without this.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. I'd like to be able to use my gitlab webhooks to trigger rebuilding and redeployment at c66. At the moment, the payload of gitlab isn't support, so no branch-name can be detected. As result of this issue, the c66 trigger is always triggered, no matter which branch i push to. At the meantime, gitlab is getting more and more interesting for us as company but this is a reason not to move to them...

    Link to Webhook-Docs with payload-description:
    https://gitlab.com/help/web_hooks/web_hooks

    Many thanks :)

    9 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. Testing app changes on Cloud66 can be time consuming, esp. when iteratively trying to resolve an production issues in a realistic environment since I have to redeploy again and again.

    I'd love if you published a Vagrant box that mimics the c66 Rails stack (in this case) so I can iterate quickly before deploying to c66.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. 1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. It would be great if I could create two Redis servers with different settings. One would be a cache server and the other server would be used for persistent data.

    10 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. Rails 3.2 is going to end its official maintenance cycle.

    If Cloud66 bought a enterprise version of https://railslts.com/ they could then offer it as a addon to their Rails customers. Thus ensuring that the rails 3.2 stacks can have support. going forward

    2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. We get notifications when deployment starts successfully but not when it doesn't (for example if a server cannot be reached via SSH).

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. support latest release of mongoDB

    36 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. For example,

    if CPU load is at 2 or greater for longer than 5 minutes;

    if Memory is greater than 60%.

    If disk space is greater than 80%.

    ETC.

    Since you have monitor this stuff already, it would be fantastic to just get notified under certain conditions and triggers.

    Would save people a lot of money by not having to buy a third party Server Monitoring solution like New Relic or Scout.

    5 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. I need to be able to see, monitor and record errors that are happening on a live production server.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. Deploy hooks don't run when scaling services, so it'd be nice to have a new hook point that covers all circumstances in which a Docker container is created or destroyed, on scale or deploy.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. 4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?