Skip to content

General

General

Categories

160 results found

  1. All backups currently go to the USA. This is slow and expensive for those of us in other parts of the world (as well as introducing data sovereignity issues). It would be great if other regions were supported as well, or even better, if backups could be configured to use S3 buckets that we could supply.

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. Then we don't have to look up how to install it.

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    completed  ·  1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. With one of my stacks, I currently have to download 80 tar chunks and reassemble them. This isn't viable as a long term soluton. Please just provide a link that will let me download the whole (large) file.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Currently, I can have managed backups for all my databases. In my case this is Postgres and Redis.

    I don't really need/want backups for Redis. They actually create high Disk I/O issues on my redis server. But right now it's all or nothing, so I have to have Redis backed up.

    I would appreciate the ability to choose which DB to backup.

    8 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    completed  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. When provisioning a stack, make sure the timezones/time configurations
    are same on all servers (web app, database, etc).

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. The timezone setting in the cloud66 account setup controls timezones for servers and the web UI. I want my servers to run on UTC and I'd like to be able to see times as CST in the web UI. It would be nice to have two different timezone settings for each of these use cases.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. It would be nice to have an api that creates a new process server, so that people would love to create a server from the app. Say for example, if in case of sysytem like building seperate servers for each accounts, then it would be useful

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. If you have a bad deployment, you don't want to leave your stack in a bad state. However, doing another deployment means you can no longer access the deployment logs for the bad deploy.

    Having the deployment logs from the last N (7 days, 5 deployments, whatever, I understand you wouldn't want to keep them forever) deployments would make the logs available for diagnosis once a stack is in a good state again.

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Sometimes for debugging I want to access a service as if it's local. This is especially useful for databases. Right now, I can use CX to open an SSH connection, but setting up a tunnel must be done manually, and it takes some work finding the right credentials.

    I could see this being used in a couple different ways:
    a) cx ssh -s [stack] -e [environment] --tunnel [remotehost]:[remoteport]:[localhost]:[localport] server_name

    b) cx databases tunnel -s [stack] server_name

    Option (a) is generic, while option (b) meets the exact need I have. It could infer ports from its knowledge…

    14 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    completed  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. When spinning up a new cloud server, it would be great to be able to specify the name of the server, instead of using an automatically-generated animal name. For example, I might create a new custom server called "Background Worker 1". Its hostname would be "background-worker-1", and its domain would be "background-worker-1.stack-name.c66.me".

    14 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. hey there - my deployment is hanging on the preparing server step - what should I do?

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. You can currently only have one SSL certificate per stack. Since it's possible to route domains to containers it would be great to have one SSL certificate per container. This would make cheap people (like me) very happy because wildcard certificates are sooo expensive :)

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. You can currently only ssh to the host that runs the docker containers, or you can ssh to an image of your container, but not to an already running container.
    It's very useful to ssh to a container in order to troubleshoot issues. Allowing cx to do that (by providing a container id) can save the trouble of first ssh'ing to the host, checking the running container is (docker ps) and executing an interactive shell.

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    completed  ·  1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. When you make a change to one docker image, getting that deployed is very time consuming. It rebuilds all the docker images on that stack and deploys each one - even though only one service has changed. So either interrogate the git sha to see if the service needs rebuilding/redeploying, or allow a single service to be redeployed via command line or/and UI.

    7 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Right now, the ajax request to load our stacks list (https://app.cloud66.com/stacks_list) is REALLY slow. We see load times around 4-5 seconds on avg for that page. We have roughly 30 stacks. It's extremely annoying to have to wait every time we navigate to the main stacks list since that's the main screen we navigate back to.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    completed  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. Similarly to suggestion - https://cloud66.uservoice.com/forums/176741-general/suggestions/4270169-only-redeploy-based-on-a-webhook-if-the-relevant-b but for docker stacks.

    The services.yml file configures a git_branch, but currently it's only used as the source of where to take the files to deploy. Every commit to the repo will trigger stack deployment, which means that every commit to a feature branch (many times a day..) triggers a deploy.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    completed  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. OpenShift -> https://blog.openshift.com/openshift-v3-deep-dive-docker-kubernetes/
    And Meteor Galaxy -> http://info.meteor.com/blog/meteor-and-a-galaxy-of-containers-with-kubernetes
    Are both choosing Kubernetes as foundation for their next generation PaaS.
    I was wondering does cloud66 has any plans to integrate with Kubernetes ?

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. I would like a button (or menu item) that launches a browser already pointing to my running server. It is a bit of a nuisance to copy/paste the long - unique - URL into a new browser tab/window just to preview my work.

    Admittedly, I am coming from Nitrous (have been a long-time fan and one of the original beta-testers) and this is a standard feature I expect.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    A link to each server can be found in the server page of the Cloud 66 UI. A direct link to the site can also be found near the application name on the applications dashboard.

  19. We invoke the redeployment hook from our build server when the corresponding branch passes all tests. However, if during the build someone pushes more changes to the branch then untested changes can be deployed as C66 deploys the HEAD of the branch.

    I'd like to be able to specify the git-ref to deploy as a parameter so that I can know the tested version is what will be released.

    As an added benefit this would allow us to deploy any branch, with the configured one being the default if nothing is specified.

    6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    completed  ·  2 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. Given our service oriented architecture, we have lots of different firewall rules opened up for different machines on different stacks. It's impossible right now to know what rules are for what other stacks and why they're there. Also our local ssh firewall rules sometimes get out of date if our local IP changes, but we're wary of removing rules because we don't know exactly why they're there.

    I'd love to be able to label these rules so we have context into why they're open. (eg: "Office", or "AuthService" etc)

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    completed  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?